Home Contact Us Advanced Search Journal Help
IJoC
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editors
Manuel Castells
USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism
Larry Gross
USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism
Book Review Editors
Gustavo Cardoso
University of Lisbon
Josh Kun
USC Annenberg School
Jack Linchuan Qiu
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Editorial Board
Sean Aday
George Washington University
Jonathan David Aronson
USC Annenberg School
Sandra Ball-Rokeach
USC Annenberg School
Svetlana Balmaeva
Liberal Arts University
Sarah Banet-Weiser
USC Annenberg School
Howard S. Becker
San Francisco
Yochai Benkler
Harvard Law School
Lance Bennett
University of Washington
Bruce Bimber
UC Santa Barbara
Pablo Javier Boczkowski
Northwestern University
Jennings Bryant
University of Alabama
Susan Douglas
University of Michigan
John D.H. Downing
Southern Illinois University
William Dutton
Oxford University
Richard Dyer
University of London
John Nguyet Erni
Lingnan University
Oscar Gandy
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Dilip Gaonkar
Northwestern University
Ian Glenn
University of Cape Town
Trudy Govier
University of Lethbridge
Sergio Godoy
Universidad Catolica de Chile
Larry Grossberg
University of North Carolina
James Hamilton
Duke University
Eszter Hargittai
Northwestern University
John Hartley
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Kathleen Hall Jamieson
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Henry Jenkins
USC Annenberg School
Steve Jones
University of Illinois-Chicago
Elihu Katz
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Douglas Kellner
UCLA
Marwan M. Kraidy
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Justin Lewis
Cardiff University
Sonia Livingstone
London School of Economics
Robin Elizabeth Mansell
London School of Economics
Robert McChesney
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Toby Miller
University of California, Riverside
Peter R. Monge
USC Annenberg School
Thomas Nakayama
Northeastern University
Horace Newcomb
University of Georgia
Zhongdang Pan
University of Wisconsin - Madison
John Durham Peters
University of Iowa
Alejandro Piscitelli
University of Buenos Aires
Dana Polan
NYU
Marshall Scott Poole
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Adam Powell
University of Southern California
Monroe Price
University of Pennsylvania
Janice Radway
Northwestern University
N. Bhaskara Rao
Centre for Media Studies, New Delhi
Michael Renov
USC Cinematic Arts
Ellen Seiter
USC Cinematic Arts
Michael Schudson
Columbia University
Jonathan Sterne
McGill University
John Thompson
Cambridge University
Yariv Tsfati
University of Haifa
Ingrid Volkmer
University of Melbourne
Simon J. Wilkie
USC Economics
Barbie Zelizer
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Yuezhi Zhao
Simon Fraser University

University of Southern California

International Journal of Communication, Vol 1 (2007)

The UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Building a New World Information and Communication Order?

Rachael Craufurd Smith

Abstract


The UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions was adopted in October 2005. This article explores the Convention’s objectives and the contribution that the Convention is likely to make to their realisation in the future. In its final form the Convention is considerably less ambitious than many of its promoters had wished: key provisions are expressed in aspirational terms, the Convention’s dispute resolution procedures are consensual and the Convention explicitly states that it does not modify the rights or obligations of its Parties under pre-existing international agreements. The extensive support that the Convention received from the international community at the time of its adoption, with one hundred and forty eight countries voting in its favour, nevertheless affords it considerable political weight. The Convention may consequently play a role in the interpretation of existing international agreements, including the WTO agreements, and in negotiations over their future development. The article also suggests that there may be more scope than is initially apparent for the Convention to be used as a basis for evaluating state measures, not only in relation to international trade, but also regarding the domestic treatment of cultural minorities. For such review to become meaningful, however, active support will be necessary not only from civil society organisations, which played a key role in the Convention’s initial development, but also from contracting states and the various Convention organs

Full Text: PDF Copyright Notice Privacy Policy University of Southern California USC Annenberg Center