Home Contact Us Advanced Search Journal Help
IJoC
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editors
Manuel Castells
USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism
Larry Gross
USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism
Book Review Editors
Gustavo Cardoso
University of Lisbon
Josh Kun
USC Annenberg School
Jack Linchuan Qiu
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Editorial Board
Sean Aday
George Washington University
Jonathan David Aronson
USC Annenberg School
Sandra Ball-Rokeach
USC Annenberg School
Svetlana Balmaeva
Liberal Arts University
Sarah Banet-Weiser
USC Annenberg School
Howard S. Becker
San Francisco
Yochai Benkler
Harvard Law School
Lance Bennett
University of Washington
Bruce Bimber
UC Santa Barbara
Pablo Javier Boczkowski
Northwestern University
Jennings Bryant
University of Alabama
Susan Douglas
University of Michigan
John D.H. Downing
Southern Illinois University
William Dutton
Oxford University
Richard Dyer
University of London
John Nguyet Erni
Lingnan University
Oscar Gandy
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Dilip Gaonkar
Northwestern University
Ian Glenn
University of Cape Town
Trudy Govier
University of Lethbridge
Sergio Godoy
Universidad Catolica de Chile
Larry Grossberg
University of North Carolina
James Hamilton
Duke University
Eszter Hargittai
Northwestern University
John Hartley
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Kathleen Hall Jamieson
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Henry Jenkins
USC Annenberg School
Steve Jones
University of Illinois-Chicago
Elihu Katz
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Douglas Kellner
UCLA
Marwan M. Kraidy
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Justin Lewis
Cardiff University
Sonia Livingstone
London School of Economics
Robin Elizabeth Mansell
London School of Economics
Robert McChesney
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Toby Miller
University of California, Riverside
Peter R. Monge
USC Annenberg School
Thomas Nakayama
Northeastern University
Horace Newcomb
University of Georgia
Zhongdang Pan
University of Wisconsin - Madison
John Durham Peters
University of Iowa
Alejandro Piscitelli
University of Buenos Aires
Dana Polan
NYU
Marshall Scott Poole
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Adam Powell
University of Southern California
Monroe Price
University of Pennsylvania
Janice Radway
Northwestern University
N. Bhaskara Rao
Centre for Media Studies, New Delhi
Michael Renov
USC Cinematic Arts
Ellen Seiter
USC Cinematic Arts
Michael Schudson
Columbia University
Jonathan Sterne
McGill University
John Thompson
Cambridge University
Yariv Tsfati
University of Haifa
Ingrid Volkmer
University of Melbourne
Simon J. Wilkie
USC Economics
Barbie Zelizer
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Yuezhi Zhao
Simon Fraser University

University of Southern California

International Journal of Communication, Vol 2 (2008)

Distinctive Characteristics of China's Path of ICT Development: A Critical Analysis of Chinese Developmental Strategies in Light of the Eastern Asian Model

Yu Hong

Abstract


Although China roughly follows the developmental path of Japan and the Four Asian Little Tigers [Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea] to pursue an export-led industrialization in the global informationalized economy, the timing, agents and modes of China’s information and communications technology (ICT) development are distinctively different from the Eastern Asian model, and therefore, China may not repeat the success stories of these economies. By comparing China’s ICT development with these Eastern Asian precedents, this paper argues that because the state introduced a massive infusion of foreign direct investment (FDI) to jump-start China’s ICT production and exports in the early 1990s, this mode of development has established the absolute domination of foreign capital in ICT production and exports. China’s infant ICT industries have been compelled into global market competition, and the premature entry of China’s infant industries has limited their development space from early on. Being squeezed by globalized market competition and hindered by financial and technological barriers, infant domestic enterprises do not enjoy an autonomous space to develop their R&D and market capacities and thereby could only hope to excel in the large-volume and low value-added stage of final production. As part of the global chain of production, domestic firms are specialized in handling large volume and low value-added production in global economy. Meanwhile, they lack financial, technological and marketing capacities to create a global reach and have to face an underdeveloped domestic market. It is uncertain whether China, while facing a different and difficult external business environment, can bypass its current position of low-tech assembly operation.

Full Text: PDF Copyright Notice Privacy Policy University of Southern California USC Annenberg Center